FAccT (previously FAT*) is dedicated to the inherent risks that come with the increasing adoption of data-driven algorithmic decision making systems in socially consequential domains such as policing, criminal justice, health care and education. Author rebuttals: (Please note, this is a different process than that of We will create a form for you to share the links, which will be emailed to authors one week in advance of the deadline.The form for uploading your video is here. Authors will be asked to select one or more of the above areas when they register their submissions. and justice in systems, policy, and pedagogy. At least one author of each accepted paper is required to register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the ACM Digital Library. Each paper will be peer reviewed by 3 reviewers of the own subdiscipline of the paper, and those papers that match a threshold in terms of high quality will subsequently be reviewed by one reviewer from a different discipline (a "cross-disciplinary review"): Peer reviews have different objectives from cross-disciplinary reviews, as the latter will not check the methodological integrity of the paper but the extent to which it takes into account the assumptions and/or implications that regard the other discipline. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. The claims/arguments are explored in sufficient depth. The work situates itself in the context of related work. Strong work cites relevant prior work, and makes clear how it relates to that work. Papers got accepted to ACM CCS, IEEE ICC, IEEE CNS, IEEE Milcom, and. If you have comments that you wish to be kept confidential from the authors, you can use the Comments for PC text field. systems develop in relation to racism and anti-blackness? Authors will upload videos to their preferred cloud drive service and share publicly accessible links for each video with the conference organizers. Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process. Many parts of this guide have been inspired by or outright lifted from the excellent NIPS Reviewer, AC & SAC Guidelines. Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission Trained machine learning models are increasingly used to perform high-impact tasks in areas such as law enforcement, medicine, education, and employment. For accessibility related concerns, contact inclusion@facctconference.org.
Zaid Khan Authors are also responsible for ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the relevant journal's submission policies. The work incorporates foresight on populations most likely to bear disproportionate negative effects directly related to this work. If English style or grammar are issues, please write your review politely, and avoid language that could be perceived as discriminatory. Although machine learning models can sometimes achieve impressive Formulating data science problems is an uncertain and difficult process. This process will enable the Program
Min Kyung Lee, Ph.D. - minlee.net Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be rejected without review. site by submitting a tentative title and abstract and specifying their will take place in the context of a worldwide reckoning with racism and Instead, meanings range from typical or characteristic, to a proportionate match between sample and population, to a more Government agencies are embracing machine learning to support a variety of resource allocation decisions. It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! This means that you provide your preferences (a.o. It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. June 12-15, 2023 in Chicago, USA. last year, papers and position papers are in scope for the If you accidentally find out the identities of the authors, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell your Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. This flagship conference is generally considered the most prestigious in the field of HCI and attracts thousands of international attendees annually. All Your paper ID can be found in EasyChair, or in the subject line of the acceptance email from facct22@easychair.org (sent in early April). You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. If using LaTeX, please use the template given in sample-manuscript.tex when downloading the latest version of the ACM LaTeX documents. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference publishing research in algorithmic fairness, accountability, and transparency. Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, Computer vision and other biometrics data science applications have commenced a new project of profiling people. ACM FAccT. decisions are made. practice at the intersection of many disciplines.
Chi - Acm Sigchi insufficiently addressed issues in computing such as: How do algorithmic Other support for diversity, equity and inclusion at FAcct 2022 will be announced. context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. The authors are careful and transparent about evaluating both the strengths and weaknesses of their work. In this case, the authors should not cite the report, so as to preserve anonymity. 2nd FATREC Workshop: Responsible Recommendation. Options and templates are available for both Word and LaTeX users. What constitutes a "fair" allocation of the items among them? proceedings, if they are accepted. There is one key exception. Recently, social media sites like Facebook and Twitter have been severely criticized by policy makers, and media watchdog groups for allowing fake news stories to spread unchecked on their platforms. guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body sufficient. General Data Protection Regulation. Recent work has revealed that major automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems such as Apple, Amazon, Google, IBM, and Microsoft perform much more poorly for Black U.S. speakers than for white U.S. speakers. Each paper will be reviewed by members of the program committee. Your video must have *embedded* captions (see next section). It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses, however, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere We will be using the new ACM workflow for formatting manuscripts, described here. 9%!
FAccT 2021 Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency Researchers postulate that this may be a We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Abstract submission: 30 January 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. above areas when they register their submissions. Claims are well supported by theoretical analysis, evidence, argument, and/or experimental results. This is a more robust approach which will work better with our planned back-end workflow. Technical reports and pre-prints: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that is already available without peer reviewing as a technical report (e.g., in SSRN, arXiv, or similar). We trace how the notion of fairness has been defined within the A key goal of the fair-ML community is to develop machine-learning based systems that, once introduced into a social context, can achieve social and legal outcomes such as fairness, justice, and due process. ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. How should the
ACM FAccT 2021 - HotCRP.com As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. . will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Track Chair as early as possible in the process. Take your job seriously and be fair. Authors must omit their names and affiliations The non-archival option is offered to avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to discipline-specific journals. Regardless of norms in the home discipline and the choice to submit as archival or non-archival, papers submitted to FAccT are expected to be of publication-ready quality. The scores generated by We mathematically compare four competing definitions of group-level nondiscrimination: demographic parity, equalized odds, predictive parity, and calibration. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, In such applications, individuals should have the ability to change the decision of the model. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released. Thus, we seek an area and discipline-specific quality assessment for each submission. Recent research taking issue with such opacity has proposed standardized processes for dataset documentation. while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc content.
CFP - easychair.org Authors are encouraged to reflect on these We
Machine Learning Blog | ML@CMU | Carnegie Mellon University format, with one inch margins, 9 point Times New Roman font. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission.
GitHub - lixin4ever/Conference-Acceptance-Rate: Acceptance rates for Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. When appropriate, authors are encouraged to Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA FAccT '23 website Bibliometrics Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 Downloads (cumulative) 84,968 Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888